US Ex Rel. Schuhardt v. Washington University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss complaint that included representative claims, and observing that “[b]ecause of the breadth of the allegations – possibly hundreds of doctors and thousands of claims over several years – the complaint need not cite specifics for every transaction”
• “[A] relator ‘must provide some representative samples of the fraud which detail the specifics of who, where and when.’” (quoting United States ex rel. Minn. Ass’n of Nurse Anesthetists v. Allina Health Sys. Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21402 at (D. Minn. Mar. 3, 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).