U.S. ex rel. Saldivar v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving a county jail operated by a private entity pursuant to a contract with county
• denying summary judgment motion as premature where motion was served on first day of discovery period and admonishing counsel that filing a premature motion not only disregards the opposing parties’ discovery rights but also wastes judicial resources
• denying summary judgment motion as premature where motion was served on first day of discovery period and admonishing counsel that filing a premature motion not only disregards the opposing parties’ discovery rights but also wastes judicial resources
• “A district court may grant summary judgment in the early stages of discovery only if ‘further discovery would be pointless’ and the movant is ‘clearly entitled to summary judgment.’” (quoting Robak v. Abbott Labs., 797 F. Supp. 475, 476 (D. Md. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).