US Ex Rel. Miller v. BILL HARBERT INTERN. CONST.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony of an expert witness who had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and had not examined the evidence, but instead testified generally about cartel economics

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).