Skip to main content
· 11/2/1993

US Ex Rel. Kent v. Aiello

Citations

  • 836 F. Supp. 720
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 16611
  • 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1714
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It appears relatively clear that properly read, the 8 statute defines the class of plaintiffs who may bring suit under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h
  • “[A]s the 4 high court has explained, in statutes of this type the remedial purpose of the statute counsels a 5 broad reading. Whistleblower protection statutes are remedial in nature and thus should be 6 liberally construed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karlton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.