Skip to main content
· 2/25/2008

US Ex Rel. Chabot v. MLU Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 544 F. Supp. 2d 1326
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14277
  • 2008 WL 540732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires Plaintiff to attach any document to the complaint.” (cleaned up)
  • observing that a motion to strike under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should only be granted if the matter sought to be omitted has no possible relationship to the controversy, may confuse the issues, or otherwise prejudice a party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia C. Fawsett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.