US Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Pennsylvania Shipbuilding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that relator’s “willingness to expend considerable wealth pursuing the claim evidences its meritorious underpinnings.”
• finding defendant to be prevailing party where FCA case was functionally dismissed with prejudice
• “Because Congress intended the standard under § 3730(d)(4) to reflect the standard under § 1988, the court will rely on cases analyzing § 1988 where relevant. See generally 99 Sen. Rep. 345 (discussing that “[t]his standard [in § 3730(d)(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).