Skip to main content
· 10/6/2009

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. ABM Industries Inc.

Citations

  • 261 F.R.D. 503
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97646
  • 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the absence of individual suits is an indication that each class member’s potential recovery does not provide the incentive to bring a solo action
  • named plaintiffs need not work 13 during identical time periods nor for entire class period
  • further finding that “it would be both redundant and a wildly inefficient use of limited judicial resources for each [employee] to file an individual lawsuit alleging claims for their unpaid wages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Austin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.