Skip to main content
· 1/25/2010

U.S. EEOC v. CTI Global Solutions, Inc.

Citations

  • 422 B.R. 49
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5688
  • 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 595
  • 2010 WL 334245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that because the court was “persuaded that Plaintiffs primary purpose in bringing this Title VII action is to protect the public welfare ... the fact that a secondary, pecuniary interest may be involved does not bring the case outside of the § 362(b)(4) exemption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deborah K. Chasanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.