Skip to main content
· 9/19/1991

US DEPT. OF HUD EX REL. GIVLER v. Smith

Citations

  • 775 F. Supp. 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declaring that “[wjhen considering qui tam statutes, the Court has never questioned the standing of the relator involved.”
  • indicating that “[t]he relator who has received the government’s right to litigate through assignment, also has a personal stake in the litigation by virtue of the statutory bounty.”
  • engaging in a similar analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cahn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.