U.S. Concord, Inc. v. Harris Graphics Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• merely observing that defendant’s argument that the “negligent misrepresentation claim fails to satisfy Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirements” was “well-taken”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).