US Bank Trust Natl. Assn. v. Roberts

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 48

Syllabus

Summary judgment; foreclosure; notice. Summary judgment in favor of the bank is affirmed in this foreclosure case. The plaintiff, who was a subsequent buyer of the property at issue, argued that the bank was required to send the notice of pending foreclosure to him in addition to the former property owner, who signed the mortgage. However, in this case, the plaintiff did not sign the mortgage, was not a borrower under the terms of the documents, and was not a successor interest to the former owner. Therefore, the bank was not required to send him notice.