U.S. Bank Trust Natl. Assn. v. Keane
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 727
Syllabus
Foreclosure summary judgment Civ.R. 56(C) deposition cross-examination of affiant Civ.R. 56(F) service of subpoena Civ.R. 45. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to U.S. Bank when an opposition to summary judgment was never filed despite the trial court allowing for two extensions of time. Further, the party opposing summary judgment arguments that U.S. Bank was \hiding\ a subpoenaed witness were improper where the out-of-state, nonparty witness was not properly served with the subpoena.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that petitioner failed to allege facts of actual conflict of interest warranting habeas relief and, therefore, refusing to remand for evidentiary hearing on that claim
- holding that generalized complaints about the quality of an appellate brief do not satisfy the prejudice prong of the Strickland test
- the accused could not claim that longer period of incarceration compounded his anxiety, since he was already serving a sentence for another crime
- cannot claim anxiety of incarceration when serving time for another crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.