U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Casey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a plaintiff is on notice if “the injured party, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known of the factual basis for the wrong” (citing Gore v. Daniel O’Connell’s Sons, Inc., 17 Mass. App. Ct. 645, 647 (1984))
• plaintiff may be put on inquiry notice when informed of facts which suggest he has been injured
• plaintiff may be put on inquiry notice when informed of facts which suggest he has been injured
• “A wrong ... is not inherently unknowable if the injured party, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known of the factual basis for the wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).