U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Nehring
Citations
- 232 Conn. App. 307
Syllabus
The defendant property owner appealed from the judgment of the trial court denying his sixth motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure. The defendant claimed, inter alia, that the court erred in determining that the plaintiff was the holder of the subject note and mortgage. Held: This court dismissed the appeal as moot because the defendant's sixth motion to open the judgment was not accompanied by an affidavit, pursuant to the rule of practice (§ 61-11 (g)), averring good cause that arose since the trial court's previous ruling on the defendant's most recent motion, and, thus, no automatic appellate stay arose, the law days passed, and title vested absolutely in the plaintiff. Submitted on briefs February 20—officially released April 29, 2025
Judges: Suarez; Clark; DiPentima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.