U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. McKenna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “counsel’s alleged misadvice specifically undermined [the district court’s] equivocal warnings” that his conviction “‘could affect’ his immigration status”
• concluding that even a PSR, which stated that defendant would be “subject to ‘Administrative Removal,’ and [that] immigration proceedings would commence upon his release” did not clearly remedy counsel’s affirmative misadvice
• stating that “counsel’s alleged misadvice specifically undermined [the district court’s] equivocal warnings” that his conviction “‘could affect’ his immigration status”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).