U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Eichenholtz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “mistake” under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1), includes legal errors made by the court
• holding that a District Court’s legal error falls within the meaning of “mistake” under Rule 60(b)(1)
• holding that “mistakes” under Rule 60(b)(1) encompass a judge’s errors of law and are thus subject to a one-year deadline
• recognizing that a court’s mistake of law can form the basis for Rule 60(b)(1) relief
• holding that a movant may seek relief under Rule 60(b)(1) for a judge’s legal mistake
• holding that a “mistake” that would authorize relief from a judgment under Rule 60(b)(1) includes “both legal and factual errors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).