U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Doe
Citations
- 203 Conn. App. 218
Syllabus
The plaintiff bank sought, by way of summary process, to regain possession of certain premises from the defendants. Following the judgment of possession rendered for the plaintiff by the trial court, defendants B and F appealed, claiming that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the summary process action because a final judgment had not been rendered in the foreclosure action that had resulted in the plaintiff obtaining title to the property. Thereafter, the plaintiff returned the summary process execution of possession to the court and indicated that the defendants were dispossessed of the property. Held that this court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal, as B and F were no longer in possession of the property. Submitted on briefs February 9—officially released March 9, 2021
Judges: Alvord; Elgo; Cradle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.