U.S. Bank N.A. v. Chrismas-Beck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government agent’s error in disbursing funds does not waive government’s right to reimbursement
• reaffirming “the principle that parties receiving moneys illegally paid by a public officer are liable ex aequo et bono to refund them.”
• common law remedy of offset to recoup monies already paid not abrogated by statutory authorization of fraudulent payment remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).