U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Bernhardt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fixing value of 146 lost transparencies where the “record [wa]s barren of any evidence establishing the lost transparencies’ uniqueness”
• “The proper standard ... is a consideration of uniqueness of the transparencies and plaintiffs earning potential.”
• “The proper standard ... is a consideration of uniqueness of the transparencies and plaintiffs earning potential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).