Skip to main content
· 11/29/2012

U.S. Bank, N.A., as Servicer for the Tennessee Housing Development Agency v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company

Citations

  • 410 S.W.3d 820
  • 2012 WL 5985097
  • 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 826

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining the substance of a post-judgment motion correctly titled as a Tenn. R. Civ. P. 59.04 motion to alter or amend before determining that it extended the filing deadline
  • identifying whether motion “was one recognized under Rule 59” as a threshold question
  • “Although the Bank takes issue with the fact that Tennessee Farmers challenged most of the trial court’s rulings in its post-trial motion, we see no reason why this alone would remove it from the purview of Rule 59.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge David R. Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.