Skip to main content
· 12/16/2004

U.S. Bancorp v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 103 P.3d 85
  • 337 Or. 625
  • 2004 Ore. LEXIS 828

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • department’s intent to have rule apply retroactively is clear after examining text and context of rule and OAR 150-305.100-(B)
  • application of 1995 tax regulation on taxpayer for actions taken in 1988-92 constituted retroactive application of the regulation, since taxpayer was entitled to presume that its tax for those years would be based upon apportionment formula in 1987 regulation
  • setting out OAR 150-314.280-(E) (1987)
  • setting out OAR 150-314.280-(E) (1987)
  • allowing retroactive application of rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byers, Breithaupt, Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.