Skip to main content
· 4/30/1964

Ury v. Jewelers Acceptance Corp.

Citations

  • 227 Cal. App. 2d 11
  • 38 Cal. Rptr. 376
  • 1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “California does not have such a strong public policy against any and all contracts which would be usurious if they were made and to be performed” in California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.