Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant failed to meet its burden of making a “threshold demonstration that an adequate alternative forum was available for this litigation” in India
• holding that “[w]hatever other circumstances may justify reconsideration, mere presentation of arguments or evidence seriatim does not[,]” and quoting Brambles USA, Inc. v. Blocker, 735 F. Supp. 1239, 1240 (D. Del. 1990
• holding that “[w]hatever other circumstances may justify reconsideration, mere presentation of arguments or evidence seriatim does not[,]” and quoting Brambles USA, Inc. v. Blocker, 735 F. Supp. 1239, 1240 (D. Del. 1990
• treating delay due to litigation backlog as a factor relevant to whether an alternative forum was adequate
• finding delay of “up to a quarter of a century” “so temporally remote that it is no remedy at all.”
• affirming district court denial of motion for reconsideration where the motion was “a classic attempt at a ‘second bite of the apple’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).