Skip to main content
· 11/7/2023

Urvan v. Arnold

Syllabus

preservation, appellate review, child custody, best interests of the child, substantial change of circumstances, final decision-making authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • having resources or special software to help “clean” or delete files from the computer and having a history of accessing and viewing child pornography images
  • similarly finding with respect to the federal government’s burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.