Uruci v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that evidence speaking to country conditions at a point prior-in-time to the identified fundamental changes in circumstances has limited probative value
• rejecting the argument that the agency erred in its reliance on a national shift in power when \[t]he Parliamentary elections were but one piece of evidence considered in the aggregate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).