Ursack, Inc. v. Sierra Interagency Black Bear Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the standard of review under the APA is identical to rational basis scrutiny
• noting that where “no suspect class is involved” the “equal protection argument can be folded into the APA argument”
• noting that where “no suspect class is involved” the “equal protection argument can be folded into the APA argument”
• indicating that the Park Service’s decision to revoke a vendor’s conditional approval of its bear-proof container was akin to a “license” under the APA as it “had a substantial impact on the market for [the vendor’s] products”
• treating the rational basis test for an equal protection violation as an analogue to the APA arbitrary and capricious standard
• the rational basis 27 || standard is analogous to the “arbitrary and capricious” standard under the APA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).