Urrutia v. Blaine County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that district judge erred in permitting additional evidence on judicial review in the absence of a demonstrated procedural irregularity before the agency
• “Idaho law is well established that an applicant’s rights are determined by the ordinance in existence at the time of filing an application.”
• “[A] comprehensive plan does not operate as legally controlling zoning law, but rather serves to guide and advise the governmental agencies responsible for making zoning decisions.”
• “Where an appellate court reverses or vacates a judgment upon an issue properly raised, and remands for further proceedings, it may give guidance for other issues on remand.”
• “Where an appellate court reverses or vacates a judgment upon an issue properly raised, and remands for further proceedings, it may give guidance for other issues on remand.” (quoting Price v. Payette Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs, 131 Idaho 426, 431, 958 P.2d 583, 588 (1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).