Urquhart v. Coss
Citations
- 60 Wash. 249
- 110 P. 1001
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1034
Syllabus
<p>Arpeal — Preservation or Grounds — Objections. General objections to an original mortgage are not sufficient to raise the point that its execution had not been proven.</p> <p>Chattel Mortgages' — 'Validity—Rights or Subsequent Creditors. A subsequent creditor of a mortgagor cannot assert the invalidity of a chattel mortgage for want of acknowledgment and affidavit of good faith, where he had acquired no lien until the mortgagee had obtained possession and title in discharge of the debt; and any interest of a third person could not help such a creditor.</p> <p>Same — Priorities—Mortgagee in Possession — Attachment by Subsequent Creditors. The transfer of the possession and title of mortgaged chattels to a Txma, fide mortgagee, in satisfaction of the debt, is valid as against an attachment by a subsequent creditor, without regard to the validity of the mortgage.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, if “plaintiff wishes to defeat a motion to transfer venue, it follows that he or she should be prepared to present some credible evidence supporting his or her choice of forum”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.