Urian v. Urian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State improperly admitted testimony that the defendant’s father attempted to suppress a witness’s statement because no evidence was presented indicating “that this was done by the procurement of the defendant, or with his knowledge or consent”
• evidence that defendant's father tried to bribe witness not admissible unless father's action is linked to defendant
• evidence of a family relationship between the defendant and the person making the threat is not enough to establish a sufficient nexus to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).