Urciuolo v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff could not recover in unjust enrichment where a contract covered its dispute with the defendant
• holding that no equitable remedy was available where plaintiffs failed to allege express contracts were invalid
• holding that the virus exclusion barred coverage
• reviving unjust enrichment claim where appellate court reversed lower court's dismissal of plaintiff’s ICFA claims
• rejecting similar arguments raised by the insured regarding the virus exclusion, finding that “the novel coronavirus causing the COVID-19 pandemic led directly to the issuance of the government orders, which the complaint alleges as the cause of the losses and expenses”
• “Under Illinois law, the interpretation of an insurance policy, like any other contract, is a question of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).