Urbano v. Calissi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the Commission’s determination of lack of jurisdiction due to noncompliance with section 97-58(c) and remanding to the Commission for consideration of plaintiff’s claim
• reversing the Commission’s determination of lack of jurisdiction due to noncompliance with section 97-58(c) and remanding to the Commission for consideration of plaintiff’s claim
• finding it unnecessary to address the “date on which plaintiff was informed by competent medical authority of the nature and work-related cause of his disease” because plaintiff filed his claim within two years of becoming disabled
• finding it unnecessary to address the “date on which plaintiff was informed by competent medical authority of the nature and work-related cause of his disease” because plaintiff filed his claim within two years of becoming disabled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).