Skip to main content
· 5/1/1947

Urban v. Victory Naval Uniform Co.

Citations

  • 71 F. Supp. 270
  • 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fee-setting not a judicial decision because “none of the indicia accompanying an adversary proceeding exist”
  • court of appeals cannot review district judge’s action in refusing to certify case as extended or complex, or in fixing amount of compensation
  • “[I]t is also clear that Congress did not intend to provide full compensation and that it contemplated appointments of private counsel to supplement the efforts of professional defender organizations.”
  • “[A] determination by a district court disallowing fees in excess of the maximum limit under the [CJA] is not a reviewable order.”
  • “[A]lthough some compensation must be awarded appointed counsel under the [CJA], the district judge is accorded exclusive discretion in fixing the amount.” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
  • review unavailable of district court’s order refusing to authorize fees beyond the statutory maximum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.