· 5/1/1947
Urban v. Victory Naval Uniform Co.
Citations
- 71 F. Supp. 270
- 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fee-setting not a judicial decision because “none of the indicia accompanying an adversary proceeding exist”
- court of appeals cannot review district judge’s action in refusing to certify case as extended or complex, or in fixing amount of compensation
- “[I]t is also clear that Congress did not intend to provide full compensation and that it contemplated appointments of private counsel to supplement the efforts of professional defender organizations.”
- “[A] determination by a district court disallowing fees in excess of the maximum limit under the [CJA] is not a reviewable order.”
- “[A]lthough some compensation must be awarded appointed counsel under the [CJA], the district judge is accorded exclusive discretion in fixing the amount.” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
- review unavailable of district court’s order refusing to authorize fees beyond the statutory maximum
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.