Skip to main content
· 7/26/1994

Uptergrove v. State

Citations

  • 881 S.W.2d 529
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1854
  • 1994 WL 385329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating in dicta that once indictment is returned, defendant cannot use Article 32.01 to quash indictment, even if defendant sought dismissal prior to indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Bleil, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.