Upson v. Stafford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the holder of an access easement had no right to a \buffer of trees\ between his easement and adjoining property
• the holder of an access easement had no right to a \buffer of trees\ between his easement and adjoining property
• the holder of an access easement had no right to a ‘buffer of trees’ between his easement and adjoining property
• “[T]he holder of an easement must be adversely affected, or substantially or materially interfered with, in order to enjoin another owner’s unauthorized use.”
• minor encroachment into easement area that did not encroach upon ingress/egress portion of easement could not be said to have materially or substantially interfered with the easement holder’s use of the easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).