Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Pamlab, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a product “which would literally infringe if later in time anticipates if earlier”
• “[A] prior art composition that ‘op- tionally includes’ an ingredient anticipates a claim for the same composition that expressly excludes that ingredi- ent.”
• “A century-old axiom of patent law holds that a product ‘which would literally infringe if later in time anticipates if earlier.’” (quoting Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharms., Inc., 339 F.3d 1373, 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).