Upshaw v. US CUSTOMS SERV., DEPT., TREAS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument based on lack of written notice because the claimant had actual notice of the non-judicial forfeiture proceedings within sufficient time to submit a timely claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Huggins
  D. Delaware· 2009-04-02· cited 3×
• Ramirez v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-07-10· cited 3×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
• Bell v. Hood
  Supreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
• United States v. Jacobsen
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
• Illinois v. Andreas
  Supreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 626×
• Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.
  First Circuit· 1995-08-15· cited 288×
• Ralph Rogers v. Michael Fair
  First Circuit· 1990-04-30· cited 225×
• United States v. Giraldo
  First Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 115×
• Jorge Sarit and Dennie Espaillat v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
  First Circuit· 1993-02-23· cited 114×
• United States v. Santos Villarreal and Sergio Gonzalez
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-08-28· cited 92×
• United States v. Real Property in Section 9, Town 29 North
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-03-01· cited 35×
• United States v. Mendez-De-Jesus
  First Circuit· 1996-05-30· cited 21×
• United States v. Real Property, Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements Located at 221 Dana Avenue
  First Circuit· 2001-02-06· cited 8×
• United States v. David
  E.D. Virginia· 1996-10-25· cited 7×
• Laconia Savings Bank v. United States
  D. New Hampshire· 2000-06-16· cited 2×