· 7/18/2001
Upshaw v. US CUSTOMS SERV., DEPT., TREAS.
Citations
- 153 F. Supp. 2d 46
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10734
- 2001 WL 837599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument based on lack of written notice because the claimant had actual notice of the non-judicial forfeiture proceedings within sufficient time to submit a timely claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.