Upshaw v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court has the inherent power to protect the discovery process by imposing sanctions such as a protective order barring testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Averhart v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-10-29· cited 97×
• Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. Nichols
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-04-23· cited 72×
• Chandler v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-04-20· cited 65×
• Gutierrez v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-09-27· cited 35×
• Lloyd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-05-17· cited 33×
• Ross v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1977-03-21· cited 18×
• Crafton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-06-28· cited 8×
• Rutledge v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-08-24· cited 6×
• Knight v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-06-24· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dillard v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-10-26· cited 151×
• State Ex Rel. Keller v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 81×
• Vacendak v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-01-22· cited 81×
• Owens v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1975-09-18· cited 71×
• Johns v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1968-09-18· cited 70×
• Chatman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1975-09-23· cited 69×
• Gregory v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-09-07· cited 67×
• Dorsey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-07-28· cited 32×
• AMARO v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1968-08-16· cited 23×
• Keel v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-09-03· cited 17×
• Reynolds v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-02-14· cited 10×
• State v. Buza
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-03-31· cited 9×
• Buchanan v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-11-05· cited 7×