Skip to main content
· 10/11/1979

Upshaw v. First State Bank

Citations

  • 260 S.E.2d 483
  • 244 Ga. 433
  • 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a change in the amount owed by the principal results in a novation that releases the guarantor, even when the guarantor’s potential liability was contractually capped
  • The new “note represented a new indebtedness, which was a novation in the amount owed by the principal. This novation discharges the sureties.”
  • The new “note represented a new indebtedness, which was a novation in the amount owed by the principal. This novation discharges the sureties.”
  • wherein the note which was the sub ject of the guaranty agreement was superseded by a new note consolidating several other debts
  • “[T]his court has long held that any change, whether to the surety’s benefit or detriment[,] is a novation which discharges the surety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Jordan, Bowles, Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.