· 10/11/1979
Upshaw v. First State Bank
Citations
- 260 S.E.2d 483
- 244 Ga. 433
- 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a change in the amount owed by the principal results in a novation that releases the guarantor, even when the guarantor’s potential liability was contractually capped
- The new “note represented a new indebtedness, which was a novation in the amount owed by the principal. This novation discharges the sureties.”
- The new “note represented a new indebtedness, which was a novation in the amount owed by the principal. This novation discharges the sureties.”
- wherein the note which was the sub ject of the guaranty agreement was superseded by a new note consolidating several other debts
- “[T]his court has long held that any change, whether to the surety’s benefit or detriment[,] is a novation which discharges the surety.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Jordan, Bowles, Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.