Skip to main content
· 4/11/2011

Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District v. Dequine Family L.L.C.

Citations

  • 249 P.3d 794
  • 2011 Colo. LEXIS 289
  • 2011 WL 1348341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming that section 37-92-103(3)(a)(I) “perpetuat[es] the planning flexibility previously allowed government agencies with respect to the future water needs of their populations” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.