Upper Republican NRD v. Dundy Cty. Bd. of Equal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a decisionmaker’s awareness of an EEOC charge cannot be established by “unsupported inference”
• explaining that a claim is abandoned when a party fails to discuss it in her appellate brief
• affirming a grant of summary judgment in favor of employer on a Title VII retaliation claim
• finding clear evidence of lack of knowledge where, in addition to the employer’s testimony, there was independent testimony as well as contemporaneous meeting notes
• finding no retaliation where there was no evidence decision maker was aware of the employee’s protected conduct because temporal proximity alone does not create a genuine issue of fact as to causation
• noting that speculation cannot support a jury’s inferences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).