Upmann Ex Rel. Upmann-Terhark v. Terhark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting petitioner's argument that written judgment drafted by respondent's attorney and signed by judge did not reflect judge's actual grounds for decision, since \[w]e will not presume that the judge did not read the document or realize what was contained therein\
• rejecting petitioner’s argument that written judgment drafted by respondent’s attorney and signed by judge did not reflect judge’s actual grounds for decision, since “[w]e will not presume that the judge did not read the document or realize what was contained therein”
• “We will not presume that the judge did not read the [order drafted by counsel] or realize what was contained therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Watson v. South Shore Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-02-10· cited 12×
• Knox v. Keene Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-13· cited 10×
• Kocal v. Holt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-06-05· cited 8×
• Watson v. SOUTH SHORE REHABILITATION CENTER
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-02-10· cited 5×
• In re Custody of D.R.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-03-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Deckard v. Joiner
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-01-21· cited 142×
• In Re Marriage of Alush
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-07-22· cited 22×
• Ahn Brothers, Inc. v. Buttitta
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-05-16· cited 17×
• In Re Custody of Bourey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-09-24· cited 8×
• In Re Custody of Horbatenko
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-11-30· cited 6×