Upmann Ex Rel. Upmann-Terhark v. Terhark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting petitioner's argument that written judgment drafted by respondent's attorney and signed by judge did not reflect judge's actual grounds for decision, since \[w]e will not presume that the judge did not read the document or realize what was contained therein\
• rejecting petitioner’s argument that written judgment drafted by respondent’s attorney and signed by judge did not reflect judge’s actual grounds for decision, since “[w]e will not presume that the judge did not read the document or realize what was contained therein”
• “We will not presume that the judge did not read the [order drafted by counsel] or realize what was contained therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).