· 3/6/1990
Unum Life Insurance Company v. United States
Citations
- 897 F.2d 599
- 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1084
- 65 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 768
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3204
- 1990 WL 19707
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that often times an insurance “company (perhaps following state regulators’ properly conservative accounting practices) [will] put aside (as a reserve) considerably more money to pay future benefits than it actually needs”
- comparing results in Group Life & Health Insurance Co., supra, and Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. United States, supra, based on use of recognized mortality table in the latter case
- comparing results in Group Life & Health Insurance Co., supra , and Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. United States, supra , based on use of recognized mortality table in the latter case
- no mortality tables used; the liability in question was \mechanically calculated similarly to a typical bank account\
- no mortality tables used; the liability in question was “mechanically calculated similarly to a typical bank account”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bownes, Brown, Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.