Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. Crutchfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding, as an authorized use of discretion, the trial court determination that common questions of law or fact predominated over individual questions, where the case presented both “a significant common issue of fact” and “individual issues of law”
• “Georgia case law provides that common questions of law and fact predominate when an action is brought on behalf of purchasers of agreements from a common source, the character of the right to be enforced is common, and common relief is sought.”
• “Georgia case law provides that common questions of law and fact predominate when an action is brought on behalf of purchasers of agreements from a common source, the character of the right to be enforced is common, and common relief is sought.”
• “Georgia case law provides that common questions of law and fact predominate when an action ‘is brought on behalf of purchasers of agreements from a common source, the character of the right sought to be enforced is common, and common relief is sought’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).