Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that cases in this area “all deal with a complete prohibition of the right”
• holding that attorney did not have standing to assert his client's alleged right as a grand jury witness to have counsel present outside the jury room
• holding that attorney did not have standing to assert his client’s alleged right as a grand jury witness to have counsel present outside the jury room
• recognizing that cases in this area “all deal with a complete prohibition of the right”
• holding that in determining whether qualified immunity applies in a specific case, the court must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all
• holding that the right to choose one’s field of private employment is not violated when the state action does not constitute a “complete prohibition of the right to engage in a calling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).