Skip to main content
· 11/4/1910

Unseld v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 140 Ky. 529
  • 131 S.W. 263
  • 1910 Ky. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “not all conspiracies require swift, simultaneous parallelism”
  • “Because such a small number of firms [the issuing banks—7 entities] hold nearly 80% of the market share, the credit card market is highly concentrated and oligopolistic.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bear

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.