Skip to main content
· 12/20/1983

Unsecured Creditors' Committee v. Farmers Savings Bank (In Re Toledo Equipment Co.)

Citations

  • 35 B.R. 315
  • 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 4813
  • 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • creditors committee must first make appropriate showing that debtor-in-possession has un justifiably failed to prosecute preference action before commencing action itself
  • creditors’ committee is impliedly authorized to bring to bring action if it would benefit and debtor-in-possession has unjustifiably failed to prosecute the case
  • Although denying authorization to sue under the facts of the case, the court recognized that under appropriate circumstances an action may be commenced by the creditors' committee.
  • where the creditor to whom the alleged preferential transfer was made is a creditor on whom the debtor-in-possession is relying during the course of reorganization, it may not be in the debtor’s best interest to bring a preference action against that creditor
  • DIP wished to maintain good relationship with creditor
  • creditor must make appropriate showing before commencing action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Speer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.