Uniweld Products, Inc. v. Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The DC’s excusing claimant from a work search due to a “very confused situation” was reversed where the record showed that claimant was adequately notified that she was released to perform light duty and that her employer had a job for her.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schafrath v. Marco Bay Resort, Ltd.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-29· cited 9×
• McClung-Gagne v. HARBOUR CITY VOLUNTEER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-11· cited 1×
• Lowe's of Kissimmee v. Monroe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-14· cited 1×
• AT&T Communications and Sedgwick CMS v. Victoria Murray Rosso
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kerce v. Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-10-30· cited 22×
• EB Malone Corp. v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-18· cited 12×
• Van Eyk v. RN Hicks Const. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-12-07· cited 8×
• Santiago v. Orr Industries, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-29· cited 7×
• Atlantic Plastering, Inc. v. O'HARA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-22· cited 5×
• Hernandez v. EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICAN ADJUSTO
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-23· cited 5×
• MARRIOTT IN-FLITE SERVICES v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-10· cited 5×
• Seminole County Board of County Commissioners v. Chaplin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-13· cited 3×
• LGH Construction Co. v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-28· cited 1×