University Plaza Realty Corp. v. City of Hackensack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that challenger established standing under § 1064 notwithstanding the parties’ written agreement not to challenge each other’s registration or each other’s rights to use and sell goods under the mark
• remanding to the TTAB to consider “the agreement, its construction, [and] its validity if necessary to decide the issues properly before it in this cancellation proceeding, including the issue of estoppel”
• remanding to the Board to consider “the agreement, its construction, [and] its validity if necessary to decide the issues properly before it in this cancellation proceeding, in- cluding the issue of estoppel”
• “[Petitioner] has demonstrated its real interest in the proceeding through its reasonable allegation that its trademark . . . and the trademark [sought to be canceled] are confusingly similar.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).