Skip to main content
· 6/16/1994

University of North Carolina v. Shoemate

Citations

  • 336 N.C. 615
  • 447 S.E.2d 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff was not entitled to discovery during the pendency of defendant’s dispositive motion, where plaintiff made no showing that discovery was relevant to that dispositive motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.