University Mechanical Contractors of Arizona, Inc. v. Puritan Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that even though the insurance policy’s definition of “occurrence” did not include a temporal limitation, other policy provisions operated to limit coverage to “the policy period”
• approving of the Court of Appeals’ reliance on Outdoor World when the insurance policy restricted coverage to accidents that caused property damage when the insurance policy was in effect
• based on combination of two policy definitions, court found no coverage under one clause of policy because resulting property damage did not occur during policy period
• “On appeal, we will sustain the trial court’s ruling on any theory supported by the evidence, even though the trial court’s reasoning may differ from our own.”
• “On appeal, we will sustain the trial court’s ruling on any theory supported by the evidence, even though the trial court’s reasoning may differ from our own.”
• “On appeal, we will sustain 4 the trial court’s ruling on any theory supported by the evidence, even though the trial court’s reasoning may differ from our own.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).